Healthy Living News from Prostate.net » Reports http://www.prostate.net/blogs Healthy Living for Men blog Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:51:05 +0000 en hourly 1 Institute of Medicine (IOM) New Recommendations on Vitamin D Intake http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/institute-of-medicine-iom-new-recommendations-on-vitamin-d-intake/ http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/institute-of-medicine-iom-new-recommendations-on-vitamin-d-intake/#comments Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:19:52 +0000 Editor http://www.prostate.net/blog/?p=1163 Continue Reading »]]> Experts convened by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) have issued the Vitamin D and Calcium 2010 Report setting new recommendations for the intake of vitamin D for Americans and Canadians. Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) were set at 600 IU for people aged 1 to 70 and at 800 IU for those aged 71 and older. For infants up to 1 year old, an Adequate Intake (AI) level of 400 IU was recommended. These recommendations represent large increases over the prior ones (which were 200 IU for people aged 1 to 50, 400 IU for those aged 51 to 70, and 600 IU for people aged 71 and older). For children, other than newborns, the new recommendations also surpass the 2008 recommendation by the American Academy of Pediatrics that recommended 400 IU per day for newborns through teenagers.

While some studies suggest that even higher intakes of vitamin D may be useful for a range of purposes, the IOM considered the data behind those suggestions preliminary.

From reviewing national surveys of blood levels, the IOM concluded that the majority of Americans and Canadians are getting enough vitamin D (as well as calcium), although elderly individuals are more likely to fall short on both and some adolescent girls may not get quite enough calcium.  The IOM determined an individuals vitamin D level is sufficient when their blood levels are at or above 20 ng/mL.

The IOM expressed concern about excessive intake of vitamin D. but raised the Upper Tolerable Intake Levels (ULs) (above which there is a risk of harm) for vitamin D. The UL for individuals aged 9 and older was set at 4,000 IU, up from 2,000 IU previously. The IOM noted that some studies showed an increase in adverse events (including overall mortality, some cancers, cardiovascular disease, fractures and falls) at vitamin D blood levels (i.e., 25-(OH)D levels) ranging from about 30 ng/mL to 48 ng/mL (75 to 120 nmol/L).

More on Vitamin D and Prostate Health

]]>
http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/institute-of-medicine-iom-new-recommendations-on-vitamin-d-intake/feed/ 0
Best Sources of Lycopene For Prostate Health-Watermelon, Tomatoes or Guava? http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/best-source-of-lycopene-watermelon-tomatoes-or-guava-prostate-cancer/ http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/best-source-of-lycopene-watermelon-tomatoes-or-guava-prostate-cancer/#comments Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:21:18 +0000 Editor http://www.prostate.net/blog/?p=876 Continue Reading »]]> tomatoes cancer lycopeneEveryone knows that tomatoes are an excellent source of lycopene, right? Processed tomato products, ranging from sun-dried varieties to tomato ketchup, are proven to have high concentrations of this nutrient.[1] So why are some experts claiming that guava and watermelon have just as much – even more – lycopene than tomatoes?[2]

First of all, lycopene is a carotenoid, a type of phytonutrient found in high concentrations in some fruits, and a nutrient shown to fight prostate cancer.[3] When you compare the three fruits mentioned here, fresh unprocessed guava and watermelon have more lycopene gram-for-gram than whole, raw tomatoes.

And therein lies the critical difference: studies of lycopene and its anticancer fighting powers have focused on processed tomatoes, not fresh ones. While processed tomato foods easily beat out guava and watermelon in terms of lycopene content, fresh tomatoes do not fare as well.

That does not mean tomatoes are not great sources of lycopene, but consumers should not neglect guava and watermelon also as a regular part of their diet, along with tomatoes, in order to increase the lycopene in their diet.

Here’s a brief look at the lycopene content of tomatoes, tomato products, guava, and watermelon, courtesy of NutritionData.com and the US Department of Agriculture Carotenoid Database. All amounts of lycopene are in micrograms (mcg) per 100 grams of the food item:

  • Tomato powder: 46,263 mcg
  • Sundried tomatoes: 45,908
  • Tomato paste: 29,330
  • Tomato puree: 16, 670
  • Tomato sauce: 13,400 –  18,900
  • Tomatoes, canned, stewed: 4,088
  • Guava: 5,203
  • Watermelon: 4,532-4,868
  • Tomato (fresh, raw): 2,573-3,025

A 2002 study conducted by researchers at the South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory in Lane, Oklahoma, and at the Phytonutrients Laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland, involved evaluation of 13 different cultivars (varieties of a plant that have been selected or intentionally maintained) of watermelon. The scientists found that watermelon has as much or more lycopene as raw tomatoes, and that the amount of the phytonutrient found in watermelon depends on both the variety and growing conditions of the fruit.

This latter fact is true for guava and tomatoes as well, so the amount of lycopene in the tomatoes, guava, and watermelon you eat will differ depending on where they were grown, the nutrient content of the soil, the variety, and so on.

One thing that will not vary, however, is that these three fruits are excellent sources of lycopene. So for better prostate health – and overall health – enjoy tomatoes (in many forms), guava, and watermelon often.

See also

Study of Lycopene and Prostate Cancer Prevention for African American Men


References

[1] Shi J, LeMaguer M. Lycopene in tomatoes: chemical and physical properties affected by food processing. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2000; 20(4): 293-334.

[2] Chandrika UG et al. Carotenoid content and in vitro bioaccessibility of lycopene from guava (Psidium guajava) and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) by high-performance liquid chromatography diode array detection. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2009 Nov; 60(7): 558-66; USDA Carotenoid database: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/car98/car_tble.pdf; Watermelon beats tomatoes: http://www.nutraingredients.com/Research/Watermelon-beats-tomatoes-in-lycopene-stakes

[3] Ellinger S, et al. Tomatoes, tomato products and lycopene in the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer: do we have the evidence from intervention studies? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2006; 9(6): 722-27; Ellinger S, et al. Tomatoes and lycopene in prevention and therapy is there an evidence for prostate diseases? Aktuelle Urol 2009 Jan; 40(1): 37-43; Etminan M, et al. The role of tomato products and lycopene in the prevention of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:340-345.

]]>
http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/best-source-of-lycopene-watermelon-tomatoes-or-guava-prostate-cancer/feed/ 0
Prostate Cancer Statistics http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/prostate-cancer-statistics/ http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/prostate-cancer-statistics/#comments Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:52:45 +0000 Editor http://www.prostate.net/blog/?p=700 Continue Reading »]]> Prostate cancer is second only to skin cancer as the most common type of cancer to affect men in the United States. According to the latest estimates from the American Cancer Society, the year 2010 will see an increase in the number of new cases of prostate cancer and deaths related to the disease: about 217,730 men will receive a diagnosis of prostate cancer, and about 32,050 men will die of the disease. This compares with an estimated 192,280 new diagnoses and 27,360 deaths in 2009.

Overall, about 16 percent, or one in six men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during his lifetime. More than 2 million men in America are now living with a diagnosis of the disease. Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States, accounting for about 11 percent of cancer-related deaths in men. However, prostate cancer often progresses slowly and many men who have the disease die of other causes.

In fact, the most recent research shows that the relative 5-year survival rate (percentage of patients who live at least 5 years after a cancer diagnosis) for all men with prostate cancer is nearly 100 percent. (Five-year relative survival rates compare the observed survival with that expected for people who do not have cancer.) The relative 10-year survival rate is 91 percent, while it is 76 percent for 15 years. Given the continuing improvements in screening, diagnosis, and treatment for prostate cancer, men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer today likely will have an even better prognosis than those who have been living with the disease.

]]>
http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/prostate-cancer-statistics/feed/ 0
Provenge and Prostate Cancer Update http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/provenge-and-prostate-cancer-treatment-update/ http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/provenge-and-prostate-cancer-treatment-update/#comments Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:23:55 +0000 Editor http://www.prostate.net/blog/?p=358 Continue Reading »]]> The study that led to the FDA approval for Provenge for prostate cancer treatment has been made available in the New England Journal of Medicine. In the study, men with prostate cancer that no longer responds to hormone therapy (basically, chemical castration) lived about four months longer if they took Provenge than if they got placebo treatment. The four months comes at a cost of $93,000. There are about 100,000 American men that have the kind of hormone-resistant, metastatic cancer the drug is approved to treat although Dendreon, the company that makes Provenge can only make enough at this point for 2,000 patients in the first year. More at NPR on the studies findings and more on the FDA’s questions over Provenge.

]]>
http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/provenge-and-prostate-cancer-treatment-update/feed/ 0
Environmental Chemicals and Cancer – The Presidents Cancer Panel Report http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/environmental-chemicals-and-cancer-the-presidents-cancer-panel-report/ http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/environmental-chemicals-and-cancer-the-presidents-cancer-panel-report/#comments Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:09:33 +0000 Editor http://www.prostate.net/blog/?p=239 Continue Reading »]]> Prostate cancer risk has been linked to a number of environmental and other toxins and now the recently released President’s Cancer Panel Report on Environmental Cancer Risk has warned that “environmentally induced cancer has been grossly underestimated.”

The New Environmental Cancer Risk Report

The Panel’s report noted that approximately 80,000 chemicals are on the market in the United States, and many of them, which are used by millions of Americans every day, are poorly studied, have not been studied at all, or are unregulated. Such overall lack of responsible oversight and understanding of these chemicals means that “exposure to potential environmental carcinogens is widespread,” according to the Panel.

The Panel experts point out that children are at great risk for cancer due to environmental toxins and need to be protected. That protection should include stronger regulations for environmental contaminants and the use of safer alternatives to the currently used chemicals.

What You Can Do Now To Reduce Cancer Risk

Although eliminating cancer risk is far from simple, the Panel notes there are many things Americans can do right now every day to reduce their exposure to cancer-causing environmental substances. Adopting these preventive measures can help protect you and your family against the dangers of environmental carcinogens.

Choose organic foods as much as possible, which will significantly reduce your exposure to pesticides, antibiotics, and growth hormones (the latter two contaminants are found primarily in conventionally raised meat and dairy foods).

Avoid or minimize consumption of charred, processed, and well-done meats to limit your exposure to the cancer-causing substances heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Buy products that are free of the endocrine-disruptor BPA. BPA exposure can come from canned foods, plastic water bottles, and plastic containers for foods. Instead, choose foods stored in glass or tetra packaging and use glass, stainless steel, or BPA-free containers.

Stay away from products that may contain phthalates, an endocrine-disruptor that belongs to a class of chemicals used as softeners in polyvinyl chloride products. Such items include children’s toys, cling wrap, plastic food storage containers, shower curtains, building materials, vinyl flooring, and some personal care products such as shampoos, lotions, and cosmetics.

Do not microwave food or beverages in plastic because chemicals can leach into the food when heated.

Remove your shoes when entering your house, especially if you work with or around chemicals.

Use nontoxic products to keep pests out of your garden, such as beneficial insects and diatomaceous earth.

Use filtered tap water rather than commercially bottled water.

Properly dispose of medications, paints, solvents, and household chemicals to minimize contamination of drinking water and the soil.

Check your home periodically for radon exposure. Radon is the second-leading cause of lung cancer.

Avoid use of the antibacterial agent called triclosan, an endocrine disruptor, which is used in products such as soaps, deodorants, and cleaning products.

Turn off lights and electrical devices when they are not in use.

Do not smoke, and avoid secondhand smoke. Especially do not expose children to smoke.

Protect yourself against ultraviolet radiation by using sunscreen and wearing clothing that protects you against the sun.

Question the necessity of undergoing any test or procedure that involves exposure to radiation, such as mammograms, CT scans, and radiation therapy. Keep records of any imaging tests you receive and, if possible, the radiation dose for each test.

Reduce electromagnetic energy exposure from cell phones, text rather than call when possible, keep calls brief, and use a headset.

Walk, bike, take public transportation, and/or drive a fuel-efficient car when possible to help reduce the amount of toxins emitted into the environment.

Women and men considering pregnancy should avoid exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and known or suspected carcinogens before conception, throughout pregnancy, and early life, when the risk of damage is greatest.

Specific Environmental Carcinogens

Specific potential and known cancer-causing contaminants named in the Panel’s report, and a few common places they are found, include:

Aromatic amines (e.g., benzidine; in pesticides, rubber production)

Asbestos (old ceiling tiles, building materials)

Arsenic (pesticides, wood preservatives)

Benzene (exhaust fumes, cigarette smoke, glues)

Beryllium (medical devices, combustion of coal and fuel oil)

Butadiene (in production of tires, adhesives, paints, footwear)

Cadmium (plastics, fertilizers)

Chromium (dyes, wood preserving, steel production)

Ethylene oxide (disinfectant, pesticides)

Formaldehyde (particle board, carpets, drapes)

Hair dyes

Lead (batteries, ceramics)

Mercury (dental fillings, batteries)

Methylene chloride (pesticides, solvents)

Nickel (nickel plating, batteries)

Polychlorinated biphenols (PCBs; banned in 1979 but still in the environment)

Silica (sandblasting, foundries)

Styrene (food containers)

Sulfuric acid (cleaning fluid)

Talc (pottery, paper, paint, cosmetics)

Toluene (gasoline, solvents)

Trichloroethylene (TCE; degreaser)

Wood dust (carpentry, furniture making)

Xylene (gasoline, paint, thinners)

]]>
http://www.prostate.net/blogs/2010/environmental-chemicals-and-cancer-the-presidents-cancer-panel-report/feed/ 0